MeshCentral, built by Ylian Saint-Hilaire and licensed under Apache-2.0, is a mature, actively developed remote-management toolkit: remote desktop, an in-browser terminal, file transfer, and a plugin ecosystem, running as a single self-hosted Node.js server. It's genuinely free, with nothing paywalled behind a commercial tier, and it has been refined over more than a decade of production use. If remote access to a fleet of devices is the whole job you need done, it's hard to argue with.
It's also single-purpose by design, and that's not a criticism, it's the scope MeshCentral set for itself. It doesn't ship patch management, scripting automation, software inventory, SNMP monitoring, network discovery, ticketing, or compliance mapping. Most teams that start with MeshCentral for remote access end up standing up two or three more tools once they need the rest of an RMM stack.
Breeze starts from the other direction. Remote desktop, PTY terminal, and file transfer are built natively into the same agent as everything else (see Remote Access), not a separate MeshCentral instance bolted on the side the way some other open-source RMMs do it. Around that sits patching, ticketing, SNMP monitoring, network discovery, and CIS compliance automation (13 of 18 Controls mapped), plus a built-in AI operator that investigates an alert, applies a fix, and documents what it did, inside a 4-tier risk engine you control.
Both are open source, Breeze under AGPL-3.0, MeshCentral under Apache-2.0, so this isn't a licensing argument. If you only need remote access, keep using MeshCentral; it's good at its job. If you're bolting other tools around it to get patching, tickets, and compliance out of the same fleet, here's how the two compare feature by feature.